Administrator Presents 2010 Tentative Budget County
Administrator Joe Mareane delivered to the County Legislature a 2010
Tentative County Budget that calls for reductions in both spending and
workforce, while meeting the Legislature’s goal of increasing the tax
levy by no more than 3 percent. The recommended
budget totals $73.1 million in local spending. The
budget reduces spending by $1 million (1.3%) and the County’s workforce
by 26 full-time equivalent positions (3.4%), while striving to maintain
a scope of services responsive to community needs.
It calls for the 3% increase in the tax levy (the total
amount of property tax revenue that must be collected to balance the
budget) and increases the tax rate (the amount property owners pay per
thousand dollars assessed value) by one cent, to $5.94. Administrator
Mareane stressed that “daunting” economic
forces have shaped this budget, not County excess.
“Our problems are not a reflection of a government that
has been living beyond its means, is wasteful or inefficient, or has
chosen to provide services that are nice to do, but not essential,” the
administrator states. “In fact, we are the
opposite of that. This government is lean,
productive, and focused on services that respond to the real needs of
our community. Therefore, the decisions
that will be made as a part of the 2010 budget process will be
extraordinarily difficult—made not to “trim the fat”, but with the
recognition that we must adapt to an environment that has been
profoundly impacted by a global recession that is broad and deep.” Economic
pressures on the 2010 budget include a projected million-dollar drop in
sales tax revenue from what was budgeted in 2009, a million-dollar
increase in the cost of mandated programs, and a $1.2 million increase
in mandated employee pension expense—reflecting the first installment
in rapidly rising employer contributions to offset significant losses
in the State pension fund. The recommended budget maintains a “balanced response” to the County’s fiscal challenges, filling the County’s projected $4.8 million budget gap through both increased revenue and reduced spending. The package will
be the focus of legislative review through the Expanded Budget
Committee over the next two months, leading to legislative action in
November. Contacts: County Administrator Joe Mareane, 274-5551;
James Dennis, Chair, Budget, Capital and Finance
Committee, 387-4058; Michael Koplinka-Loehr, Chair of the Legislature,
274-5434 or 257-2329. Budget Community
Advisory Panel Delivers 2009 Report The Budget
Community Advisory Panel, whose initial study in 2004 produced
wide-ranging fiscal recommendations which, in part, led to the County’s
current budget process, presented the Legislature with an updated
report on County fiscal practices and policies, which
recommends how the County should respond to its current fiscal
challenges. The citizen panel, reconvened
by the County Administrator and Chair of the Legislature’s Budget,
Capital and Finance Committee in May, from its renewed three-month-long
study finds that: §
The economy is not likely to rebound quickly
from the current recession. which may produce long-term structural
changes in the nation’s economy. The
recession’s effects on New York State create high probability of
immediate and future cuts in state aid to public entities, with
counties particularly vulnerable because of the nature of the services
they provide. Effects of the recession on
the State Retirement System will drastically increase costs for every
government across New York State. §
Competition for property tax dollars from
taxpayers will intensify, when even moderate increases in local tax
levies are likely to exceed affordability for large segments of the
population. §
Rapid rise of fringe benefit expenses may
create ever-increasing gaps in total compensation between public
employees and those in the private and not-for-profit sectors. §
The current scope and level of County services
are not sustainable in this new environment, requiring long-term
solutions to achieve a sustainable budget, including elimination or
reduction of non-essential programs, service delivery by a smaller
County workforce. and possible shift of some services to
non-governmental organizations. Mandated
programs must also be examined for potential cost-saving strategies. The Panel
recommends specific immediate and longer-term actions by the County
under the categories of People, Programs, and Partnerships. Among the Panel’s recommendations: People: §
Reduce the number of County employees through
such strategies as productivity improvements and reducing the scope of
County services and programs. As part of
productivity improvements, undertake a “Lean Office” initiative to develop streamlined processes to deliver
services. §
Restrain growth in compensation by reducing
wage and salary levels and the taxpayer-supported cost of employee
health benefits. Programs: §
Approach 2010 budget review from a programmatic
perspective, beginning to prioritize programs as part of the process. §
Respond to targeted state aid reductions, where
possible, by reducing the service supported with that aid, rather than
replacing the aid with local dollars. §
Institute an organization-wide system of
program evaluation, performance measurement, and benchmarking—not as a
budget tool but as a management strategy to assess and improve
performance, and to work toward operational efficiencies. §
Establish a “business case” protocol for review
of capital projects and proposed programs. Partnerships: §
Continue to reach out to other governments and
organizations to explore areas of mutual interest and benefit, with the
goal of providing more efficient, cost-effective service to taxpayers. Panel member
John Neuman commended the County for making significant strides in cost
control over the past five years, but noted that much more needs to be
done in today’s challenging environment. He
said the Panel “truly believes that the Legislature is at a point where
it can lead the way in the current difficult economic environment and
become broadly known for smart, instigative, yet sensitive management
of the tough trade-offs between what is desirable in services of all
kinds and what is truly affordable.” The Budget
Community Advisory Panel’s full report is available for review at the
County’s website at http://www.tompkins-co.org/pubinfo/budget. Contact: John Neuman, Budget Community Advisory Panel,
273-2112; James Dennis, Chair, Budget, Capital and
Finance Committee, 387-4058 . Legislature
Expresses Concern About Proposed Federal Aircraft Rescue and
Firefighting Rules The Legislature,
by a vote of 12-3, voiced official concern about possible new Federal
Aviation Administration rules regarding aircraft firefighting and
rescue. (Legislators Mike Hattery, Tyke
Randall and Chair Mike Koplinka-Loehr voted no.) Supporting
an alternate proposal advanced by Legislator Dooley Kiefer, the
Legislature, stopped short of opposing any or all changes in the
regulations and citing specific predicted adverse local impacts,
including a significant increase in the local airport firefighting
force. The Legislature’s action urges that
Senators Schumer and Gillibrand to “pay attention to details of the
rulemaking as they apply to small commercial airport whose level of
congestion and needs are not automatically the same as the major
commercial airports.” While supporting the
resolution, Legislator Mike Sigler suggested it didn’t go far enough,
predicting it could very well lead to a federal mandate that the County
will have to pay for. Contact: Dooley Kiefer, Vice Chair, Facilities and Infrastructure Committee, 257-7453; Airport Manager Robert Nicholas, 257-0456. Among other
actions, the Legislature §
Awarded contracts to upgrade the County human
resources and payroll system, a capital project studied and developed
over the past two years and discussed for much longer.
Lawson Software, Inc., of St. Paul, MN was awarded the
software contract, at a cost of $233,414 and Kinsey and Kinsey, of Glen
Ellyn, IL, the implementation contract, at a cost of $344,870. Funds are already budgeted through the 2009
capital budget. §
Approved several updates to policy and
procedure revisions as part of the ongoing program to update the
County’s administrative policy manual, and updated the rule of the
Legislature governing parameters for how Legislators interact with
departments and staff to acquire and disclose information.
|